4.5 Article

A DIGE approach for the assessment of rat soleus muscle changes during unloading: effect of acetyl-L-carnitine supplementation

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 8, 期 17, 页码 3588-3604

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200701176

关键词

acetyl-L-carnitine; mass spectrometry; skeletal muscle; two-dimensional in-gel electrophoresis; unloading

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research [FIRB RBR NO7BMCT]
  2. Word Antidoping Agency (WADA)
  3. Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche
  4. University of Bari-Progetti di Ateneo 2007
  5. Doctorate School of Molecular Medicine, University of Milano

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After hind limb suspension, a remodeling of postural muscle phenotype is observed. This remodeling results in a shift of muscle profile from slow-oxidative to fast-glycolytic. These metabolic changes and fiber type shift increase muscle fatigability. Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) influences the skeletal muscle phenotype of soleus muscle suggesting a positive role of dietary supplementation of ALCAR during unloading. In the present study, we applied a 2-D DIGE, mass spectrometry and biochemical assays, to assess qualitative and quantitative differences in the proteome of rat slow-twitch soleus muscle subjected to disuse. Meanwhile, the effects of ALCAR administration on muscle proteomic profile in both unloading and normal-loading conditions were evaluated. The results indicate a modulation of troponin I and tropomyosin complex to regulate fiber type transition. Associated, or induced, metabolic changes with an increment of glycolytic enzymes and a decreased capacity of fat oxidation are observed. These metabolic changes appear to be counteracted by ALCAR treatment, which restores the mitochondrial mass and decreases the glycolytic enzyme expression, suggesting a normalization of the metabolic shift observed in unloaded animals. This normalization is accompanied by a maintenance of body weight and seems to prevent a switch of fiber type.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据