4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of circulating monocytes in Chinese premenopausal females with extremely discordant bone mineral density

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 8, 期 20, 页码 4259-4272

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200700480

关键词

Bone mineral density; Circulating monocyte; Osteoclastogenesis; Protein

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30230210, 30470534, 30600364]
  2. Scientific Research initiated Fund of Hunan Normal University [531120-1113]
  3. NIH [R21 AG027110-01A1, R01 GM60402, R01 AR050496, K01 AR02170-01A2, P50 AR055081]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [K01AR002170, R01AR050496, P50AR055081] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM060402] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R21AG027110] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis (OP) is a major public health problem, mainly characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD). Circulating monocytes (CMCs) may serve as progenitors of osteoclasts and produce a wide variety of factors important to bone metabolism. However, the specific action mechanism of CMCs in the pathogenesis of OP is far from clear. We performed a comparative protein expression profiling study of CMCs in Chinese premenopausal females with extremely discordant BMD, identified a total of 38 differentially expressed proteins, and confirmed with Western blotting five proteins: ras suppressor protein 1 (RSU1), gelsolin (GSN), manganese-containing superoxide dismutase (SOD2), glutathione peroxidase 1(GPX1), and prolyl 4-hydroxylase beta subunit (P4HB). These proteins might affect CMCs' trans-endothelium, differentiation, and/or downstream osteoclast functions, thus contribute to differential osteoclastogenesis and finally lead to BMD variation. The findings promote our understanding of the role of CMCs in BMD determination, and provide an insight into the pathogenesis of human OP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据