4.3 Article

Analysis of electrostatic contributions to the selectivity of interactions between RING-finger domains and ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22120

关键词

protein interactions; RING-finger domains; ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes; free energy calculations; homology modeling; electrostatic interactions

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education [SAF2005-05109-CO2-01, BIO2005-00533, PSE-010000-2007-1]
  2. QosCosGrid [BQU2003-0448]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The zinc-coordinated protein motifs known as RING-finger domains, present on a class of ubiquitin ligases (E3's), recruit ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), tethering them to substrate proteins for covalent modification with ubiquitin. Each RING-finger domain can recruit different E2s, and these interactions are frequently selective, in that certain RING-finger domains associate preferentially with certain E2s. This selectivity acquires particular biological relevance when the recruited E2s exert specialized functions. We have explored the determinants that specify the presence or absence of experimentally detectable interaction between two RING-finger domains, those on RNF11 and RNF103, and two E2s, UBC13, a specialized E2 that catalyzes ubiquitin chain elongation through Lys63 of ubiquitin, and UbcH7, which mediates polyubiquitylation through Lys48. Through the iterative use of computational predictive tools and experimental validations, we have found that these interactions and their selectivity are partly governed by the combinations of electrostatic interactions linking specific residues of the contact interfaces. Our analysis also predicts that the main determinants of selectivity of these interactions reside on the RING-finger domains, rather than on the E2s. The application of some of these rules of interaction selectivity has permitted us to experimentally manipulate the selectivity of interaction of the RING-finger domain-E2 pairs under study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据