4.6 Article

NMR structural analysis of Sleeping Beauty transposase binding to DNA

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 23-33

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2386

关键词

DNA transposon; Sleeping Beauty transposase; paired domain; DNA binding; NMR spectroscopy; Circular Dichroism spectroscopy

资金

  1. North Carolina Biotechnology Center [2012-BRG-1206]
  2. National Institute of Health [1R01DK082516, P01-HD32652]
  3. University of North Carolina (Faculty Research Grant)
  4. Charlotte Research Institute (Wachovia Faculty Fellowship)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon is the most widely used DNA transposon in genetic applications and is the only DNA transposon thus far in clinical trials for human gene therapy. In the absence of atomic level structural information, the development of SB transposon relied primarily on the biochemical and genetic homology data. While these studies were successful and have yielded hyperactive transposases, structural information is needed to gain a mechanistic understanding of transposase activity and guides to further improvement. We have initiated a structural study of SB transposase using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to investigate the properties of the DNA-binding domain of SB transposase in solution. We show that at physiologic salt concentrations, the SB DNA-binding domain remains mostly unstructured but its N-terminal PAI subdomain forms a compact, three-helical structure with a helix-turn-helix motif at higher concentrations of NaCl. Furthermore, we show that the full-length SB DNA-binding domain associates differently with inner and outer binding sites of the transposon DNA. We also show that the PAI subdomain of SB DNA-binding domain has a dominant role in transposase's attachment to the inverted terminal repeats of the transposon DNA. Overall, our data validate several earlier predictions and provide new insights on how SB transposase recognizes transposon DNA. PDB Code(s): 2m8e

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据