4.6 Article

Mechanism of N10-formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase derived from complexes with intermediates and inhibitors

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 219-228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2005

关键词

formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase; folate enzymes; ping-pong mechanism; formylphosphate; ligase

资金

  1. NIH [CA 76560]
  2. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [W-31-109-Eng-38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N10-formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase (FTHFS) is a folate enzyme that catalyzes the formylation of tetrahydrofolate (THF) in an ATP dependent manner. Structures of FTHFS from the thermophilic homoacetogen, Moorella thermoacetica, complexed with (1) a catalytic intermediateformylphosphate (XPO) and productADP; (2) with an inhibitory substrate analogfolate; (3) with XPO and an inhibitory THF analog, ZD9331, were used to analyze the enzyme mechanism. Nucleophilic attack of the formate ion on the gamma phosphate of ATP leads to the formation of XPO and the first product ADP. A channel that leads to the putative formate binding pocket allows for the binding of ATP and formate in random order. Formate binding is due to interactions with the gamma-phosphate moiety of ATP and additionally to two hydrogen bonds from the backbone nitrogen of Ala276 and the side chain of Arg97. Upon ADP dissociation, XPO reorients and moves to the position previously occupied by the beta-phosphate of ATP. Conformational changes that occur due to the XPO presence apparently allow for the recruitment of the third substrate, THF, with its pterin moiety positioned between Phe384 and Trp412. This position overlaps with that of the bound nucleoside, which is consistent with a catalytic mechanism hypothesis that FTHFS works via a sequential ping-pong mechanism. More specifically, a random bi uni uni bi ping-pong ter ter mechanism is proposed. Additionally, the native structure originally reported at a 2.5 degrees resolution was redetermined at a 2.2 angstrom resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据