4.6 Article

Electrostatic contributions drive the interaction between Staphylococcus aureus protein Efb-C and its complement target C3d

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 17, 期 11, 页码 1894-1906

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1110/ps.036624.108

关键词

proteins of the immune system; structure; computational analysis of protein structure; molecular mechanics/dynamics; thermodynamics; hydrodynamics; complement; Efb-C; electrostatics

资金

  1. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [W-31-109-Eng-38]
  2. Southeast Regional Collaborative Access Team (SER-CAT)
  3. Argonne National Laboratory
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM078988, AI071028, P01AI68730]
  5. National Science Foundation [0523908, CNS-0421109, CNS-0454333]
  6. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0523908] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The C3-inhibitory domain of Staphylococcus aureus extracellular fibrinogen-binding protein (Efb-C) defines a novel three-helix bundle motif that regulates complement activation. Previous crystallographic studies of Efb-C bound to its cognate subdomain of human C3 (C3d) identified Arg-131 and Asn-138 of Efb-C as key residues for its activity. In order to characterize more completely the physical and chemical driving forces behind this important interaction, we employed in this study a combination of structural, biophysical, and computational methods to analyze the interaction of C3d with Efb-C and the single-point mutants R131A and N138A. Our results show that while these mutations do not drastically affect the structure of the Efb-C/C3d recognition complex, they have significant adverse effects on both the thermodynamic and kinetic profiles of the resulting complexes. We also characterized other key interactions along the Efb-C/C3d binding interface and found an intricate network of salt bridges and hydrogen bonds that anchor Efb-C to C3d, resulting in its potent complement inhibitory properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据