4.2 Article

A new system for heterologous expression of membrane proteins: Rhodospirillum rubrum

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 88-94

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2009.10.014

关键词

Membrane protein; Heterologous protein expression; Rhodospirillum rubrum; Intracytoplasmic membrane; ICM

资金

  1. NIH [R21GM57322]
  2. Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterologous expression of membrane proteins has met with only limited success. This work presents a new host/vector system for the production of heterologous membrane proteins based on a mutant of the facultatively phototrophic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum. Under certain growth conditions, R. rubrum forms an intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM) that houses the photosynthetic apparatus, the structural proteins of which are encoded by puhA and pufBALM. The mutant R. rubrum H2, which was constructed by allelic exchange deleting puhA and pufBALM, does not form ICM. This strain was used as a host for a plasmid expressing the Pseudomonas aeruginosa membrane protein MscL from the Rhodobacter capsulatus puc promoter. ICM was formed in the H2 strain producing MscL but not in the vector control strain. These results suggest that a heterologous membrane protein stimulates ICM formation in R. rubrum and indicate that the capacity to form an ICM that can accommodate heterologous proteins makes R. rubrum a host that will be useful for membrane protein production. A aeruginosa MscL, which forms inclusion bodies when produced in Escherichia coli, was expressed in R. rubrum H2 and purified from membranes with a yield of 22.8-23.4 mg/L culture (5.53-5.60 mg/g cell paste). Additionally Streptomyces lividans KcsA and A aeruginosa CycB were produced and purified from R. rubrum H2 with yields of 13.7-14.4 mg/L culture (2.19-2.55 mg/g cell paste) and 6.6-7.4 mg/L culture (1.1 - 1.2 mg/g cell paste), respectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据