4.2 Article

Heterologous expression and characterization of wild-type human cytochrome P450 1A2 without conventional N-terminal modification in Escherichia coli

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 188-200

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2007.10.010

关键词

human cytochrome p450 1A2; N-terminal membrane anchor domain; catalytic function; spin equilibrium; heterologous expression; N-terminal modification

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R37 CA090426] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES00267] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, wild-type human CYP1A2 without the conventional N-terminal modification (second codon GCT) or the truncation of the N-terminal hydrophobic region was functionally expressed in Escherichia coli. Its enzymatic properties were compared with N-terminally modified CYP1A2. Although modified CYP1A2 is almost all high-spin, some wild-type CYP1A2 shifted to low-spin. Spectral binding titrations with several ligands could be performed with wild-type enzyme, but not with modified enzyme. Kinetic parameters for several substrates were similar for the two CYP1A2 enzymes. However, the oxidation rates of phenacetin by modified enzyme were similar to 2-fold higher than those by wild-type enzyme. The intermolecular isotope effects were similar to 2 for phenacetin O-deethylation catalyzed by both enzymes. However, the wild-type enzyme, but not the modified enzyme, increased C-hydroxylation when O-deethylation rates were lowered by deuterium substitution. Molecular switching indicates that phenacetin rotates within the active site of wild-type enzyme and suggests a looser conformation in the active site of the wild-type enzyme than of the modified enzyme. These results reveal that the overall enzymatic properties of wild-type CYP1A2 enzyme are quite similar to those of modified CYP1A2, although its active site environment seems to differ from that of the modified enzyme. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据