4.0 Article

Facile Solid-Phase Parallel Synthesis of Linear and Cyclic Peptoids for Comparative Studies of Biological Activity

期刊

ACS COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 196-201

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/co5001647

关键词

cyclic peptoids; macrocyclization; mactolactionization; peptoid synthesis

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2012R1A1A2006417]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2006417] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of linear and cyclic peptoids, which were expected to possess better pharmacokinetic properties and biological activities for blocking the interaction between apolipoprotein E and amyloid-beta, were designed and synthesized as possible therapeutic agents. Peptoids were easily synthesized on solid-phase by the submonomer strategy and polar side chain-containing amines were effectively introduced under the modified reaction conditions. For the synthesis of cyclic peptoids, beta-alanine protected with the 2-phenylisopropyl group, which could be selectively removed by 2% TFA, was used as a primary amine to afford a complete peptoid unit. The macrolactamization between the carboxylic acid of beta-alanine moiety and terminal amine of peptoids was successfully performed in the presence of the PyAOP coupling agent on solid-phase in all the cases, providing various sizes of cyclic peptoids. In particular, some cyclic peptoids prepared in this study are the largest in size among cyclic peptoids reported to date. The synthetic strategy which was adopted in this study can also provide a robust platform for solid-phase construction of cyclic peptoid libraries. Currently, synthetic peptoids have been used to test interesting biological activities including the ApoE/A beta interaction inhibition, nontoxicity, the blood-brain barrier permeability, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据