4.4 Article

Expression Analysis of Putative Stem Cell Markers in Human Benign and Malignant Prostate

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 18-25

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.21217

关键词

prostate cancer; stem cells; EZH2; SOX2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Stem cells were suggested to be present in human prostate cancer as a small population of distinct cells, which may contribute to carcinogenesis, tumor recurrence, and chemoresistance. To identify potential prostatic stem cells, we analyzed the expression of several potential stem cell markers in benign prostate and prostatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS. CD44, CD133, Oct4, SOX2, and EZH2 expression was detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using tissue microarray assays (TMA) composed of benign (non-neoplastic) prostatic tissue, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Positive staining was defined as 1+ (<10%), 2+ (10-50%), or 3+ (>50%). RESULTS. We found CD44 staining in 97% and 72% of benign+HGPIN and malignant lesions, respectively. CD133 staining was detected in a small fraction (4 of 67) of prostate carcinomas. We found that Oct4 nuclear expression was strongly associated with benign lesions and HGPIN but not prostate cancer (P < 0.05). In most cases, nuclear expression of EZH2 and SOX2 was detected in less than 10% of cells in non-neoplastic prostate glands, HGPINs or prostate adenocarcinomas. Moreover, 27 of 33 SOX2 1+ prostate cancers were also EZH2 1+, whereas all 33 of these cases were CD44+. CONCLUSIONS. Expression of CD44 and Oct4 identified large populations of benign and malignant cells in the prostate, which did not fit the definition of stem cells as a small fraction of the total cell population. Our results suggest that combined expression of embryonic stem cell markers EZH2 and SOX2 might identify potential cancer stem cells as a minor (< 10%) subgroup in CD44+ prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate 71: 18-25, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据