4.3 Review

Computer-aided studies on the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation during work transitions

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 274-285

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.08.003

关键词

Bioenergetics; Computer model; Systems biology; Regulation of metabolism; Calcium signaling; beta-Cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present polemic paper the application of computer models of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in heart, skeletal muscle and liver to the studies on the regulation of the bioenergetic system in intact cells during work transitions is discussed. Two groups of such models are compared: group I models that involve only a direct activation of ATP usage by Ca2+, and group II models that assume a direct activation by some (probably) Ca2+-related mechanism of essentially all steps of the system. It is argued that group II models reproduce much better a broad range of variable values and system properties encountered in experimental studies. The consequences of the theoretical and experimental development of Metabolic Control Analysis, within the framework of which it has been shown that the control over the flux through the oxidative phosphorylation system is shared by essentially all components of this system, are analyzed. In particular, it is argued that in order to increase the flux very significantly, and at the same time to maintain relatively constant concentrations of such intermediate metabolites as ADP, ATP, P-i, PCr and NADH, it is necessary to activate directly many, if not all components of the system (the 'multi-step parallel activation' mechanism). Generally, it is suggested that this is not a particular form or complexity of computer models, but rather their agreement with a broad range of experimental data concerning 'macroscopic' system properties that really matters. The specificity of the regulation of the energetic system of pancreatic beta-cells is discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据