4.8 Article

Transformation of the intestinal epithelium by the MSI2 RNA-binding protein

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7517

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Fellowship
  2. US National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. NIDDK NIH [R01-DK101989-01A1]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31271584]
  5. National Basic Research programme of China (973 programme) [2011CB944103]
  6. National Transgenic Breeding Project of China [2011ZX08009-001-003, 2015SKLAB6-16]
  7. Penn P01 Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases
  8. State of Pennsylvania Health Research Formula Fund
  9. W.W. Smith Charitable Trust
  10. NCI [CA16865]
  11. NIH/NIDDK Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases [P30DK050306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The MSI2 RNA-binding protein is a potent oncogene playing key roles in haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis and malignant haematopoiesis. Here we demonstrate that MSI2 is expressed in the intestinal stem cell compartment, that its expression is elevated in colorectal adenocarcinomas, and that MSI2 loss-of-function abrogates colorectal cancer cell growth. MSI2 gain-of-function in the intestinal epithelium in a drug-inducible mouse model is sufficient to phenocopy many of the morphological and molecular consequences of acute loss of the APC tumour suppressor in the intestinal epithelium in a Wnt-independent manner. Transcriptome-wide RNA-binding analysis indicates that MSI2 acts as a pleiotropic inhibitor of known intestinal tumour suppressors including Lrig1, Bmpr1a, Cdkn1a and Pten. Finally, we demonstrate that inhibition of the PDK-AKT-mTORC1 axis rescues oncogenic consequences of MSI2 induction. Taken together, our findings identify MSI2 as a central component in an unappreciated oncogenic pathway promoting intestinal transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据