4.6 Article

Competition strategies for the incubation of white rot fungi under non-sterile conditions

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 937-944

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.04.026

关键词

Phanerochaete chrysosporium; immobilization; non-sterile condition; suspended culture; reactive dyes; decolorization; bacterial contamination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20847001]
  2. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program (863) of China [2002AA649100]
  3. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2004035035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White rot fungi is capable of oxidizing many persistent organic pollutants including dyes. The application of the fungi has been limited for wastewater treatment under non-sterile conditions due to the contamination by bacteria and other micro-organ isms. We developed a treatment approach by using immobilized white rot fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporium to degrade reactive dye K-2BP under non-sterile condition. Four different inert carriers were tested for immobilization of the white rot fungi with orthogonal experiments in comparison with suspension culture. The activity of manganese peroxidase (MnP) was used for the evaluation of oxidization performance in order to understand whether contamination of bacteria and other micro-organisms was suppressed. Under non-sterile conditions. the immobilized fungal cultures successfully restrained the growth of microzymes, coccies, and bacillus but suspension culture was highly contaminated with poor MnP activity. Under non-sterile conditions, higher MnP enzymatic activity (690 U/L vs. 125 U/L), higher decolorization efficiency (93.5% vs. 15%) and shorter reaction period (3 days vs. 6 days) were achieved in immobilized cultures in comparison with suspension culture. With the immobilized fungal cultures, no difference was observed under non-sterile and sterile conditions for the degradation of reactive dye K-2BP. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据