4.7 Article

Modelling the interaction of keratinocytes and fibroblasts during normal and abnormal wound healing processes

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0319

关键词

mathematical biology; mathematical modelling; wound healing; fibroblast-keratinocyte crosstalk; prolonged inflammation; chronic hypoxia

资金

  1. Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
  2. School of Mathematical Sciences at QUT
  3. Western Kentucky University
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0878011]
  5. Australian Research Council [DP0878011] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crosstalk between fibroblasts and keratinocytes is a vital component of the wound healing process, and involves the activity of a number of growth factors and cytokines. In this work, we develop a mathematical model of this crosstalk in order to elucidate the effects of these interactions on the regeneration of collagen in a wound that heals by second intention. We consider the role of four components that strongly affect this process: transforming growth factor-beta, platelet-derived growth factor, interleukin-1 and keratinocyte growth factor. The impact of this network of interactions on the degradation of an initial fibrin clot, as well as its subsequent replacement by a matrix that is mainly composed of collagen, is described through an eight-component system of nonlinear partial differential equations. Numerical results, obtained in a two-dimensional domain, highlight key aspects of this multifarious process, such as re-epithelialization. The model is shown to reproduce many of the important features of normal wound healing. In addition, we use the model to simulate the treatment of two pathological cases: chronic hypoxia, which can lead to chronic wounds; and prolonged inflammation, which has been shown to lead to hypertrophic scarring. We find that our model predictions are qualitatively in agreement with previously reported observations and provide an alternative pathway for gaining insight into this complex biological process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据