Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey

Aposematism and the Handicap Principle

(2012) Øistein Haugsten Holen et al.   AMERICAN NATURALIST

Why are defensive toxins so variable? An evolutionary perspective

(2012) Michael P. Speed et al.   BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS

Colour biases are a question of conspecifics’ taste

(2011) John Skelhorn   ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR

Taste-rejection behaviour by predators can promote variability in prey defences

(2010) C. G. Halpin et al.   Biology Letters

Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry

(2010) Hannah M. Rowland et al.   ECOLOGY LETTERS

Reconciling sensory cues and varied consequences of avian repellents

(2010) Scott J. Werner et al.   PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR

Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity

(2010) J. Skelhorn et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS OF THE FORM OF PREDATOR GENERALIZATION FOR APOSEMATIC SIGNALS AND MIMICRY IN PREY

(2008) Graeme D. Ruxton et al.   EVOLUTION

The evolution of Müllerian mimicry

(2008) Thomas N. Sherratt   NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN