4.8 Article

Phospholipid retention in the absence of asymmetry strengthens the outer membrane permeability barrier to last-resort antibiotics

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806714115

关键词

lipopolysaccharide; Mla; PldA; glycerophospholipid; outer membrane

资金

  1. NIH [AI138576]
  2. National Science Foundation [049347-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is a critical barrier that prevents entry of noxious compounds. Integral to this functionality is the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or lipooligosaccharide (LOS), a molecule that is located exclusively in the outer leaflet of the outer membrane. Its lipid anchor, lipid A, is a glycolipid whose hydrophobicity and net negative charge are primarily responsible for the robustness of the membrane. Because of this, lipid A is a hallmark of Gram-negative physiology and is generally essential for survival. Rare exceptions have been described, including Acinetobacter baumannii, which can survive in the absence of lipid A, albeit with significant growth and membrane permeability defects. Here, we show by an evolution experiment that LOS-deficient A. baumannii can rapidly improve fitness over the course of only 120 generations. We identified two factors which negatively contribute to fitness in the absence of LOS, Mla and PldA. These proteins are involved in glycerophospholipid transport (Mla) and lipid degradation (PldA); both are active only on mislocalized, surface-exposed glycerophospholipids. Elimination of these two mechanisms was sufficient to cause a drastic fitness improvement in LOS-deficient A. baumannii. The LOS-deficient double mutant grows as robustly as LOS-positive wild-type bacteria while remaining resistant to the last-resort polymyxin antibiotics. These data provide strong biological evidence for the directionality of Mla-mediated glycerophospholipid transport in Gram-negative bacteria and furthers our knowledge of asymmetry-maintenance mechanisms in the context of the outer membrane barrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据