4.8 Article

Deciding whether follow-up studies have replicated findings in a preliminary large-scale omics study

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314814111

关键词

false discovery rate; genome-wide association studies; metaanalysis; multiple comparisons; r value

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Community [PSARPS-294519]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [2012896]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a formal method to declare that findings from a primary study have been replicated in a follow-up study. Our proposal is appropriate for primary studies that involve large-scale searches for rare true positives (i.e., needles in a haystack). Our proposal assigns an r value to each finding; this is the lowest false discovery rate at which the finding can be called replicated. Examples are given and software is available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据