4.8 Article

Synergy of aromatic residues and phosphoserines within the intrinsically disordered DNA-binding inhibitory elements of the Ets-1 transcription factor

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1401891111

关键词

transcription factor regulation; protein dynamics; intrinsically disordered region; fuzz complex

资金

  1. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute [2011-700772]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM38663]
  3. Huntsman Cancer Institute/Huntsman Cancer Foundation
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  5. UBC
  6. CIHR Frederick-Banting Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The E26 transformation-specific (Ets-1) transcription factor is autoinhibited by a conformationally disordered serine-rich region (SRR) that transiently interacts with its DNA-binding ETS domain. In response to calcium signaling, autoinhibition is reinforced by calmodulin- dependent kinase II phosphorylation of serines within the SRR. Using mutagenesis and quantitative DNA-binding measurements, we demonstrate that phosphorylation-enhanced autoinhibition requires the presence of phenylalanine or tyrosine (phi) residues adjacent to the SRR phosphoacceptor serines. The introduction of additional phosphorylated Ser-phi-Asp, but not Ser-Ala-Asp, repeats within the SRR dramatically reinforces autoinhibition. NMR spectroscopic studies of phosphorylated and mutated SRR variants, both within their native context and as separate trans-acting peptides, confirmed that the aromatic residues and phosphoserines contribute to the formation of a dynamic complex with the ETS domain. Complementary NMR studies also identified the SRR-interacting surface of the ETS domain, which encompasses its positively charged DNA-recognition interface and an adjacent region of neutral polar and nonpolar residues. Collectively, these studies highlight the role of aromatic residues and their synergy with phosphoserines in an intrinsically disordered regulatory sequence that integrates cellular signaling and gene expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据