4.8 Article

Computational study of the activated OH state in the catalytic mechanism of cytochrome c oxidase

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220379110

关键词

oxygen reduction; electron transfer

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Biocentrum Helsinki
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. European Research Council project CROWDED-PRO-LIPIDS
  5. NIH [R01GM060353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex IV in the respiratory chain of mitochondria and bacteria catalyzes reduction of molecular oxygen to water, and conserves much of the liberated free energy as an electrochemical proton gradient, which is used for the synthesis of ATP. Photochemical electron injection experiments have shown that reduction of the ferric/cupric state of the enzyme's binuclear heme a(3)/Cu-B center is coupled to proton pumping across the membrane, but only if oxidation of the reduced enzyme by O-2 immediately precedes electron injection. In contrast, reduction of the binuclear center in the as-isolated ferric/cupric enzyme is sluggish and without linkage to proton translocation. During turnover, the binuclear center apparently shuttles via a metastable but activated ferric/cupric state (O-H), which may decay into a more stable catalytically incompetent form (O) in the absence of electron donors. The structural basis for the difference between these two states has remained elusive, and is addressed here using computational methodology. The results support the notion that Cu-B[II] is either three-coordinated in the O-H state or shares an OH- ligand with heme a(3) in a strained mu-hydroxo structure. Relaxation to state O is initiated by hydration of the binuclear site. The redox potential of Cu-B is expected, and found by density functional theory calculations, to be substantially higher in the O-H state than in state O. Our calculations also suggest that the neutral radical form of the cross-linked tyrosine in the binuclear site may be more significant in the catalytic cycle than suspected so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据