4.8 Article

Breathing fluctuations in position-specific DNA base pairs are involved in regulating helicase movement into the replication fork

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212929109

关键词

T4 DNA replication complex; helicase mechanisms; 2-aminopurine; DNA structure

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM-15792]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously used changes in the near-UV circular dichroism and fluorescence spectra of DNA base analogue probes placed site specifically to show that the first three base pairs at the fork junction in model replication fork constructs are significantly opened by breathing fluctuations under physiological conditions. Here, we use these probes to provide mechanistic snapshots of the initial interactions of the DNA fork with a tight-binding replication helicase in solution. The primosome helicase of bacteriophage T4 was assembled from six (gp41) helicase subunits, one (gp61) primase subunit, and nonhydrolyzable GTP gamma S. When bound to a DNA replication fork construct this complex advances one base pair into the duplex portion of the fork and forms a stably bound helicase initiation complex. Replacement of GTP gamma S with GTP permits the completion of the helicase-driven unwinding process. Our spectroscopic probes show that the primosome in this stable helicase initiation complex binds the DNA of the fork primarily via backbone contacts and holds the first complementary base pair of the fork in an open conformation, whereas the second, third, and fourth base pairs of the duplex show essentially the breathing behavior that previously characterized the first three base pairs of the free fork. These spectral changes, together with dynamic fluorescence quenching results, are consistent with a primosome-binding model in which the lagging DNA strand passes through the central hole of the hexagonal helicase, the leading strand binds to the outside surfaces of subunits of the helicase hexamer, and the single primase subunit interacts with both strands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据