4.8 Article

Claudin-4 induction by E-protein activity in later stages of CD4/8 double-positive thymocytes to increase positive selection efficiency

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014178108

关键词

thymus; repertoire; costimulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology of the Japanese Government
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19059009, 20200069, 19059008, 22790458] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Claudins (Clds) are crucial constituents of tight- junction strands in epithelial cells and have a central role in barrier functions. We show that Cld4 is unexpectedly expressed in normal thymic lymphocytes independently of tight junctions. The Cld4 expression was mostly confined to a portion of the CD4/CD8 double-positive (DP) cells. The proportion of Cld4+ DP cells was markedly increased in MHC-I(-/-)II(-/-)mice but decreased in Ror gamma(-/-)mice, and Cld4(+) DP cells contained higher levels of the rearranged Tcra transcripts involving the most distal Va and Ja segments than Cld4-DP cells. The Cld4 expression levels were reduced in E47-deficient mice in a gene dose-dependent manner, and ChIP analysis indicated that E2A and HEB were bound to the E-box sites of the putative Cldn4 promoter region. Functionally, Cld4 showed a potent T-cell receptor costimulatory activity by coligation with CD3. The Cld4 was distributed diffusely on the cell surface and associated with CD4/lck independently of CD3 in the resting thymocytes. However, Cld4 was strongly recruited to the immunological synapse on specific T-cell receptor engagement through antigen-presenting cells. In the fetal thymic organ culture, knockdown of Cldn4 resulted in the reduced generation of CD4/CD8 single-positive cells from the DP cells. These results suggest that Cld4 is induced by E-protein activity in the later stages of DP cells to increase the efficiency of positive selection, uncovering a hitherto unrecognized function of a Cld family protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据