4.8 Article

Structural basis for agonism and antagonism of hepatocyte growth factor

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005183107

关键词

cancer metastasis; crystal structure; HGF agonist; HGF antagonist; Met receptor tyrosine kinase

资金

  1. Jay and Betty Van Andel Foundation
  2. National Institute of Health [DK071662, DK066202]
  3. MRC [G9704528]
  4. EU [201640]
  5. Office of Science of the Department of Energy
  6. Medical Research Council [G9704528, G0800025] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [G9704528, G0800025] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is an activating ligand of the Met receptor tyrosine kinase, whose activity is essential for normal tissue development and organ regeneration but abnormal activation of Met has been implicated in growth, invasion, and metastasis of many types of solid tumors. HGF has two natural splice variants, NK1 and NK2, which contain the N-terminal domain (N) and the first kringle (K1) or the first two kringle domains of HGF. NK1, which is a Met agonist, forms a head-to-tail dimer complex in crystal structures and mutations in the NK1 dimer interface convert NK1 to a Met antagonist. In contrast, NK2 is a Met antagonist, capable of inhibiting HGF's activity in cell proliferation without clear mechanism. Here we report the crystal structure of NK2, which forms a closed monomeric conformation through interdomain interactions between the N-domain and the second kringle domain (K2). Mutations that were designed to open up the NK2 closed conformation by disrupting the N/K2 interface convert NK2 from a Met antagonist to an agonist. Remarkably, this mutated NK2 agonist can be converted back to an antagonist by a mutation that disrupts the NK1/NK1 dimer interface. These results reveal the molecular determinants that regulate the agonist/antagonist properties of HGF NK2 and provide critical insights into the dimerization mechanism that regulates the Met receptor activation by HGF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据