4.8 Article

α-Hemolysin from Escherichia coli uses endogenous amplification through P2X receptor activation to induce hemolysis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807044106

关键词

alpha-hemolysin; E. coli; erythrocytes; hemolysis; P2X

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Danish National Research Foundation
  3. Nyreforeningens forskningsfond
  4. Aarhus University Research Foundation
  5. Eva og Henry FrEnkels Mindefond
  6. A. P. Muller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  7. R. I. E. Kornig-Petersen Forskningsfond for Nyresygdomme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Escherichia coli is the dominant facultative bacterium in the normal intestinal flora. E. coli is, however, also responsible for the majority of serious extraintestinal infections. There are distinct serotypical differences between facultative and invasive E. coli strains. Invasive strains frequently produce virulence factors such as alpha-hemolysin (HlyA), which causes hemolysis by forming pores in the erythrocyte membrane. The present study reveals that this pore formation triggers purinergic receptor activation to mediate the full hemolytic action. Non-selective ATP-receptor (P2) antagonists (PPADS, suramin) and ATP scavengers (apyrase, hexokinase) concentration dependently inhibited HlyA-induced lysis of equine, murine, and human erythrocytes. The pattern of responsiveness to more selective P2-antagonists implies that both P2X(1) and P2X(7) receptors are involved in HlyA-induced hemolysis in all three species. In addition, our results also propose a role for the pore protein pannexin1 in HlyA-induced hemolysis, as non-selective inhibitors of this channel significantly reduced hemolysis in the three species. In conclusion, activation of P2X receptors and possibly also pannexins augment hemolysis induced by the bacterial toxin, HlyA. These findings potentially have clinical perspectives as P2 antagonists may ameliorate symptoms during sepsis with hemolytic bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据