4.6 Article

Development of a technique for establishing a pseudo tunnel length

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 3985-3992

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.09.030

关键词

Tunnel fire; Smoke falling; Experimental technique; Pseudo tunnel length; Temperature distribution

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16KKO125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the case of a tunnel fire, it is likely that the evacuation path of some of the tunnel users will be obstructed by the cloud of smoke that falls to the road surface of the tunnel. It is important to be able to predict the falling point of the ceiling jet smoke resulting from the fire for improving evacuation strategy. However, a considerably long tunnel is required for examining the distance traveled by the smoke generated in full and model scales fire experiments. It is often difficult to satisfy this requirement while performing fire experiments at laboratory scale. The objective of this study was to develop a new technique for examining the smoke falling phenomenon by using a model scale tunnel with insufficient length. In the new technique, a cooling apparatus was introduced to simulate heat transfer from smoke to tunnel walls. if the amount of convective heat absorbed by the cooling apparatus with length L-c is equivalent to the amount of convective heat lost by the heat transfer to the tunnel walls while the smoke flowed through the distance L-s under a tunnel ceiling, the cooling apparatus with length L-c can be equivalent of a tunnel length L-s. We denote the tunnel length simulated by the cooling apparatus by a pseudo tunnel length. A series of fire experiments were conducted using a 1:10 scale model tunnel with a length of 12 m. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of the technique for simulating a pseudo tunnel. Experimental results showed that a tunnel with a length of 18.6 m can be simulated by a 12 in tunnel using the new technique proposed. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据