4.7 Article

Yellow-colored mesoporous pure titania and its high stability in visible light photocatalysis

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 227-232

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.036

关键词

Mesoporous structure; Nanocrystals; Nanosheets; Composite

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21001093]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y4090285, Y4110418]
  3. Science Foundation of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University [0913840-Y]
  4. Qianjiang Talent Project of Zhejiang Province of China [2011R10048]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yellow-colored pure titania with a mesoporous structure was prepared by the aggregate of titania nanocrystals, which were stabilized by exfoliated titanate nanosheets via an electrostatic interaction. X-ray diffraction patterns and images of transmission electron microscope confirm that titanate sheets are randomly dispersed into the assembled titania nanocrystals without forming any self-restacked phase. This nanocrystals-nanosheets composite exhibits a mesoporous structure with pore size of similar to 6.5 nm and surface area of 2363 m(2) g(-1). Greatly different from the UV-responded properties of titania nanocrystals and titanate nanosheets, the absorption edge of nanocomposite red-shifts to visible light region. The visible light photocatalytic tests demonstrate that this nanocomposited titania shows excellent activity for the degradation of organic dyes, as well as a colorless organic pollutant of 2, 4-dichlorophenol. The possible photocatalytic mechanism that photogenerated holes as the mainly oxidant species in photocatalysis is proposed based on the trapping experiments of hydroxyl radicals or photogenerated holes. Moreover, as the nanocomposite depicts an extreme stability, no obvious deactivation occurs after five cycles. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据