4.7 Article

Muscovite clay mineral particle interactions in aqueous media

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 228-238

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.12.048

关键词

Muscovite; Particle interactions; DLVO; pH; Shear yield stress

资金

  1. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle interactions and colloid stability of aqueous clay mineral dispersions play a pivotal role in many unit operations and plant processes (e.g. crystallization, leaching, slurry transport and dewatering). In this study, the nature of the particle interactions, colloid stability and shear rheology of dilute (< 0.1 wt.% solid) and concentrated (8-57 wt.% solid) muscovite clay mineral dispersions have been investigated under a variety of industrially relevant process conditions in the pH range 1-10. Particle zeta potential profile was found to be distinctly pH-history and pulp solid loading and chemistry mediated, reflecting different isoelectric points and colloid stability at different pH values. For dilute dispersions, muscovite particle zeta potential followed pH-dependent electrokinetic trends typical of siliceous minerals which indicated an isoelectric point (iep) at similar to pH 2. For concentrated dispersions, on the other hand, the magnitude of negative particle zeta potentials was markedly lower and the concomitant ieps were significantly higher (in pH range 5-7) compared with the dilute dispersions. Isothermal, batch settling behavior and dispersion rheology for fresh dispersion at pH >3 reflected the predominance of interaction energy potentials of attractive van der Waals and repulsive electrical double layer forces' origin. The particle interactions may be theoretically treated and rationalized in the manner of DLVO theory. At pH <3 and aging at pH 7, completely different trends emerged due to incongruent leaching of the muscovite particles which led to the development of non-DLVO particle interactions. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据