4.7 Article

Influence of spray-drying operating conditions on Rhamnus purshiana (Cascara sagrada) extract powder physical properties

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 208, 期 1, 页码 205-214

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.12.021

关键词

Rhamnus purshiana; Cascara sagrada; Dry plant extract; Spray-drying; Factorial design; Direct compression

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT)
  3. Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)
  4. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba of Argentina (UNC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to study Rhamnus purshiana (Cascara sagrada) extract spray-drying in order to obtain powders with good rheological properties for direct compression (DC) and stability attributes. The experiments were carried out in a Buchi B-290 Mini Spray Dryer using colloidal silicon dioxide as carrier agent. A 2(5-1) fractional factorial statistical design was used to find adequate spray-drying operating conditions to produce Cascara sagrada powders with good flow, good compactability properties, high process yield, low moisture content, low hygroscopicity, and caking tendency. Morphology, size, structural and thermal properties of the particles were also evaluated. The operating variables studied were air inlet temperature, atomization air flow rate, pump feed rate, aspiration capacity, and feed solids concentration. The 2(5-1) factorial experimental design used was a good strategy to establish spray-drying operating conditions to produce Cascara sagrada extract powders with good properties for direct compression and high process yields. Colloidal silicon dioxide was an effective drying adjuvant. Its use in relatively high concentrations together with low atomization air flow rates improved powder flowability, increased the product's glass transition temperature, and decreased its moisture content and hygroscopicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据