4.5 Article

Medication Adherence and Symptom Reduction in Adults Treated with Mixed Amphetamine Salts in a Randomized Crossover Study

期刊

POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
卷 123, 期 5, 页码 71-79

出版社

JTE MULTIMEDIA
DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2461

关键词

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ADHD; adults; medication adherence; mixed amphetamine salts; psychostimulants

资金

  1. Shire Development, Inc., Wayne, PA [NCT00468143]
  2. Chelsea Therapeutics
  3. Eli Lilly Co.
  4. National Institute of Drug Abuse
  5. Shire Development, Inc.
  6. NYU School of Medicine
  7. Pfizer
  8. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The study objectives were to I) evaluate medication adherence for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treated with 3 times daily (TID) mixed amphetamine salts immediate release (MAS IR) versus once-daily (qAM) MAS extended release (MAS XR) in a randomized, crossover study; and 2) to examine the associations between adherence and efficacy for MAS IR and MAS XR. Methods: Sixty-two adults with ADHD were enrolled and 49 completed the study. The treatment condition order (TID-qAM or qAM-TID) was counterbalanced across participants, with an intervening washout period of >= 7 days. Adherence was assessed via 3 measures: I) self-report, 2) pill count, and 3) the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS (R)). The primary efficacy measure was the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS); secondary measures included the Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) and Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale. Results: Adherence to treatment as measured by self-report and pill count was not significantly different between MAS XR and MAS IR. Adherence was significantly better for MAS XR than MAS IR for all of the MEMS measures. The mean change in ADHD-RS, TASS, and CGI-S scores at endpoint was significantly improved for both MAS IR and MAS X R and did not differ significantly between groups. There was not a significant adherence by efficacy interaction. Conclusion: Adults with ADHD adhered equally well with MAS IR as with MAS XR when assessed by pill count and self-report, but not by the MEMS (R) measures. Both treatments significantly reduced ADHD symptoms, and efficacy was not significantly different between groups. Adherence was not associated with treatment outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据