4.7 Article

Characterization and degradation of poly(vinyl acetate)-based adhesives for canvas paintings

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 314-320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.028

关键词

Polyvinyl acetate; Acrylate; Adhesives; Accelerated degradation; Thermal analysis; Canvas painting

资金

  1. Ville de Paris
  2. Consorzio Interuniversitario per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase (CSGI)
  3. Ministry for Education and Research (MIUR) [PRIN-2009-P2WEAT]
  4. European Union (project NANOFORART) [FP7-ENV-NMP-2011/282816]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modifications occurring to two well-established synthetic formulations (Mowilith DMC2 (R), Mowilith DM5 (R)), upon accelerated degradation, were investigated. Degraded films of copolymers were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Differential Thermogravimetry (DTG), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and colorimetiy. The study highlighted the varied degradation of the two adhesives, which exhibit yellowing, alteration of their thermal and spectroscopic features and changes in their surface morphology and viscoelasticity. The main degradation route is characterized by the loss of acetyl groups, resulting in conjugated double bonds, as suggested by colorimetry and confirmed by FTIR. The loss of volatile organic acids represents a conservation issue when these adhesives are used for the lining of canvas paintings, since acidity promotes the hydrolysis of canvas cellulose. Rearrangement of the adhesives' molecular structure, and a competition between depolymerization and cross-linking were suggested by AFM and thermal analyses (changes in molecular weight are known to affect the solubility of copolymers and the possibility of their removal from works of art). The representativeness of the accelerated degradation protocol was positively assessed through comparison with naturally degraded adhesives. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据