4.7 Article

Synthesis and biodegradation studies of gamma irradiated electrically conductive hydrogels

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 166-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.05.014

关键词

Gamma irradiation; Conducting hydrogel; Interpenetrating network; Biodegradation

资金

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  3. University of the Free State Cluster program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(acrylamide-aniline)-grafted gum ghatti [Gg-cl-poly(AAm)] conducting hydrogel was prepared via Co-60, gamma-irradiation using N, N'-methylene-bis-acrylamide as a cross linker. The effects of the reaction conditions (viz, gamma dose, monomer, solvent and cross linker concentration) were investigated on the degree of swelling of Gg-cl-poly(AAm). Results showed that optimum reaction conditions for maximum percentage swelling were 10 ml of solvent, 1.08 mol/L of monomer concentration, 0.324 x 10(-1) mol L-1 of crosslinker concentration and 1.5 kGy of total dose. The semi-interpenetrating network (Semi-IPN) was converted into an IPN through the impregnation of poly(aniline) chains followed by doping with HCI. The influence of dopant concentration on the conductivity of synthesized hydrogel was investigated. Different physical properties of the synthesized hydrogel were also studied. The candidate polymers were characterized using different techniques such as X-ray diffraction and thermogravemetric analysis techniques. The mechanism of graft copolymerization via Co-60 irradiation was discussed. Biodegradation studies of the synthesized hydrogels were carried out using a soil burial test. IPN showed better degradation efficiency than semi-IPN. Weight loss of semi-IPN and IPN was 68% and 78%, respectively, in 60 days. Different degradation stages were studied using FTIR and SEM techniques. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据