4.7 Article

Effect of addition of pigments and opacifier on the hardness, absorption, solubility and surface degradation of facial silicone after artificial ageing

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 97, 期 8, 页码 1249-1253

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.033

关键词

Digital analysis; Polymer; Hardness; Absorption and solubility

资金

  1. State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP) - Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physical properties of silicone prostheses can be influenced by materials used for aesthetic detailing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two pigments and one opacifier on hardness, absorption, and solubility of a facial silicone subjected to accelerated ageing. Silicone specimens were fabricated with or without pigments and opacifier. 120 specimens were produced, with half being used for hardness testing and the other half for absorption and solubility tests. The specimens were divided into the following 6 groups (n = 20) according to whether they were made with nanofiller with pigments and opacifier: colourless (I), colourless with pacifier (IO), ceramic (C), opacifier with ceramic (OC), oil (O), and oil with opacifier (OO). The specimens were subjected to accelerated ageing for 1008 h. Hardness, absorption, and solubility were measured at baseline (B) and after 253 h (A1), 504 h (A2), and 1008 h (A3) of accelerated ageing. The data were analysed by 2-way repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD test (alpha = 0.05). The lowest hardness values were obtained for the O and OO groups (ps < 0.05 vs. other groups). Absorption and solubility did not differ between the groups, regardless of ageing period. Hardness, absorption, and solubility values did differ between the ageing time points. The use of nanofillers and opacifier did not affect the absorption and solubility properties of the silicone. However, the oil paint may have affected the polymerization of the silicone leading to initially lower hardness values. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据