4.7 Article

Ultra small-angle X-ray scattering studies on structural changes in micrometers upon uniaxial stretching of segmented polyurethaneureas

期刊

POLYMER
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 1566-1576

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.050

关键词

Ultra small-angle X-ray scattering; Uniaxial stretching; Segmented polyurethaneureas

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sport [19031015]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19031015] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS) experiments were conducted in order to examine structural changes in micrometers upon uniaxial stretching of elastomeric segmented polyurethaneureas at room temperature. It was possible to stretch the sample film up to alpha = 7.5 without break, where alpha designates the stretching ratio. Around alpha = 6.5 the sample became turbid, while it recovered transparency when the stress was removed. To understand this curious phenomenon, we conducted the USAXS experiments for the structural analyses in micrometers. Although a set of streaks appeared in the direction parallel to the stretching direction (SD) when the sample became turbid (around alpha = 7.2), more interesting result is that a set of streaks appeared in the direction perpendicular to SD much earlier around alpha = 5.0. Close examination of the scattering intensity profile revealed evolution of multiple interference peaks, which could be ascribed to the form factor of a lamellar particle. Since the streaks disappeared upon the removal of the stress, lamellar particles are considered to be crazes, which develop further into cracks in a subsequent stage. From the results of USAXS measurements, it is suggested that the lamellar-shaped crazes appeared around alpha = 5.0 being oriented parallel to SD, and further stretching created other lamellar-shaped crazes being oriented perpendicular to SD, which are co-existing with the preceding parallel crazes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据