4.0 Article

Distribution and diversity of cumacean assemblages in Admiralty Bay, King George Island

期刊

POLISH POLAR RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 341-354

出版社

POLSKA AKAD NAUK, POLISH ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2478/v10183-011-0024-6

关键词

Antarctic; South Shetlands; Cumacea; benthic communities; glacial fjord

资金

  1. University of Lodz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eleven species of cumaceans were found in 105 samples collected in Admiralty Bay (King George Island) in the summers of 1984/85 and 1985/86, from 20 to 500 m depth range. Four cumacean assemblages were distinguished using the multivariate analysis. They were characterized by the dominance of one or two species often with low density values. Two assemblages were found in open waters of Admiralty Bay. The first inhabited on sandy-clay-silt and silty-clay-sand bottom deposits in the depth range from 140 to 330 m, with Campylaspis maculata (1.6 +/- 2.1 ind./0.1m(2); F = 72.4%) and Leucon sp. (1.4 +/- 1.6 ind./0.1m(2); F = 68.9%) as key species. The second assemblage was found in the depth range from 50 to 120 m with silty-sand sediments, and it was characterized by the presence of Vauthompsonia inermis (6.5 +/- 6.6 ind./0.1m(2); F = 92.0%). A third assemblage was found in shallow waters influenced by glaciers in the bottom area of Ezcurra Inlet. It was characterized by sandy-clay-silt sediments and the presence of Eudorella splendida (14.6 +/- 9.4 ind./0.1m(2); F = 100.0%) as a core species. The last assemblage was found in the shallow sublittoral (50-100 m) of Ezcurra Inlet and the central basin, with Diastylis anderssoni armata (1.5 +/- 1.1 ind./0.1m(2); F = 85.7%) and Diastylopsis goekei (1.1 +/- 1.0 ind./0.1m(2); F = 71.4%) as the most frequent and abundant species. V. inermis is considered a eurytopic species with high frequency in the whole material, and was present in all four distinguished assemblages. E. splendida and D. goekei were also recorded in each of the assemblages, but their total frequency was lower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据