4.6 Article

The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186281

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Unions Horizon research and innovation program [665926]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While problems with cell line misidentification have been known for decades, an unknown number of published papers remains in circulation reporting on the wrong cells without warning or correction. Here we attempt to make a conservative estimate of this 'contaminated' literature. We found 32,755 articles reporting on research with misidentified cells, in turn cited by an estimated half a million other papers. The contamination of the literature is not decreasing over time and is anything but restricted to countries in the periphery of global science. The decades-old and often contentious attempts to stop misidentification of cell lines have proven to be insufficient. The contamination of the literature calls for a fair and reasonable notification system, warning users and readers to interpret these papers with appropriate care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Oncology

Misidentified biomedical resources: Journal guidelines are not a quick fix

Wytske M. Hepkema, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Joyce M. Hoek, Willem Halffman

Summary: Biomedical researchers commonly use biological models and resources, but issues such as misidentified cell lines, antibody problems, and reliability of animal models can affect study results. Journal guidelines can improve reporting quality, but their effectiveness may vary depending on factors like implementation conditions and community support.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2022)

Article Environmental Studies

Partial lottery can make grant allocation more fair, more efficient, and more diverse

Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Joeri K. Tijdink, Lex M. Bouter

Summary: This article calls on research funding organizations to experiment with integrating partial randomization into their grant allocation processes and assess its feasibility, potential implications, and perceptions. Traditional models of grant allocation based on peer review have shown shortcomings, while partial randomization holds the potential for being more fair, efficient, and diverse.

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY (2022)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations

Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Freek J. W. Oude Maatman, Willem Halffman, Wytske M. Hepkema

Summary: Citation practices are important in scientific reporting, but the development of automated citation recommendation tools should be approached with caution. These tools may encourage questionable citing practices, such as perfunctory citation and affirmation biases. Lack of transparency in the tools' underlying algorithms also poses problems. It is necessary to understand and evaluate the consequences of citation recommendation tools before implementation or broad distribution.

RESEARCH EVALUATION (2022)

Article Medical Ethics

Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values

Mohammad Hosseini, Enric Senabre Hidalgo, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Stephan Guttinger, Bart Penders

Summary: Although adherence to Mertonian values of science can cause friction with the normative structures and practices of Open Science, new normative structures need to consider the aspirations and outcomes of Open Science practices. The intersection of Open Science practices with Mertonian values becomes complicated when interests of different groups collide. Acknowledging and exploring these tensions can inform researchers' behavior and improve their interactions with other normative structures.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2022)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders

Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Lex M. Bouter, George Gaskell, Maura Hiney, Panagiotis Kavouras, Niels Mejlgaard, Nick Allum, Noemie Aubert Bonn, Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen, Costas A. Charitidis, Nik Claesen, Kris Dierickx, Anna Domaradzka, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Nicole Foger, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Teodora Konach, Krishma Labib, Ana Marusic, Daniel Pizzolato, Tine Ravn, Rea Roje, Mads P. Sorensen, Borana Taraj, Giuseppe A. Veltri, Joeri K. Tijdink

Summary: Research integrity is a key concern for stakeholders in science, and research funders play a crucial role in fostering it. To promote research integrity, we recommend that funders develop and implement a Research Integrity Promotion Plan (RIPP).

PLOS BIOLOGY (2022)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences

Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Jesper W. Schneider, Maxime Sainte-Marie

Summary: There has been a gender gap in academia, particularly in staff positions and career progression. This study focuses on gender differences in funding applications and investigates whether writing styles contribute to the skewed funding patterns. The findings suggest that writing styles are unlikely to be a significant factor in explaining the funding disparities.

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2022)

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications

Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Joeri K. Tijdink, Lex Bouter

Summary: Transparency is becoming the norm in the global research enterprise. This article summarizes ongoing efforts to increase transparency in science and funding, and proposes the adoption of open applications. Open applications could lead to more diverse collaboration, recognition of research ideas, fairer procedures for grant allocation, and increased trust in the funding process.

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2022)

Article Environmental Studies

Disentangling the local context-imagined communities and researchers' sense of belonging

Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Mads P. Sorensen, Nick Allum, Abigail-Kate Reid

Summary: This paper examines the researchers' 'local context' in the successful implementation of research integrity policies using the International Research Integrity Survey. The survey results show that academics identify more strongly with their transnational epistemic communities than with their immediate working surroundings. The theoretical understanding of academics' 'local context' is proposed based on the concept of cosmopolitanism and solidarity.

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY (2023)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Readjusting observational grids in dragonfly field guides

Sander Turnhout, Willem Halffman

Summary: Wildlife field guide books provide information for identifying species and expressing their features. This article explores how these identification tools and characteristics evolve over time in response to wider community concerns. Using Dutch field guides for dragonflies as an example, the article discusses the impact of ethics, recreational value, observational tools, biodiversity monitoring, and conservation goals on species identification. The article highlights the importance of transdisciplinary cooperation and suggests potential applications to other observational practices and communities.

SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE (2023)

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action

Tony Ross-Hellauer, Lex M. Bouter, Serge P. J. M. Horbach

Summary: Open Peer Review is gaining attention and use, but there is a need for additional evidence to responsibly promote it. In this article, we propose a preliminary research agenda and issue a call to action.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2023)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Sorting out journals: The proliferation of journal lists in China

Jing Wang, Willem Halffman, Yuehong Helen Zhang

Summary: Journal lists in China categorize, compare, and assess research and scholarly publications, reflecting the distinctive values, quality criteria, and ranking principles of the Chinese research policy and publishing system. These lists reflect changes in research policy, such as a shift away from output-dominated evaluation, specific concerns about research misconduct, and balancing national research needs against international standards, resulting in distinctly Chinese quality criteria. However, contrasting concerns and inaccuracies lead to contradictions and limitations in journal lists as policy tools.

JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2023)

Article Environmental Studies

Listing quality: Chinese journal lists in incoherent valuation regimes

Jing Wang, Willem Halffman, Serge P. J. M. Horbach

Summary: This study investigates the reception of journal lists among Chinese scientists and finds that researchers consider institutional evaluation regimes, epistemic cultures, and the influence of the commercial publishing industry when selecting publication outlets.

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY (2023)

Review Ethics

Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review

Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P. J. M. Horbach

Summary: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT has sparked discussions in academia. Using LLMs in writing tasks, including peer review, can improve productivity. However, there are no guidelines on how to use LLMs in review tasks. Research suggests that LLMs have the potential to alter the roles of peer reviewers and editors, improving the quality of peer review but raising concerns about biases, confidentiality, and reproducibility.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2023)

暂无数据