How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China
出版年份 2016 全文链接
标题
How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China
作者
关键词
Research grants, Computer and information sciences, Data mining, Engineering and technology, Computer engineering, Data management, Engineers, Research funding
出版物
PLoS One
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages e0154509
出版商
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
发表日期
2016-05-25
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0154509
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Diversity of individual research disciplines in scientific funding
- (2015) Jiang Wu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A systematic method to create search strategies for emerging technologies based on the Web of Science: illustrated for ‘Big Data’
- (2015) Ying Huang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Diabetic nephropathy research in China: Data analysis and review from the National Natural Science Foundation of China中国糖尿病肾病研究现状：对中国国家自然科学基金数据的回顾性分析
- (2015) Qiang Wan et al. Journal of Diabetes
- Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account
- (2015) Lin Zhang et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines
- (2015) Jiang Wu Journal of Informetrics
- An Overview of Big Data Industry in China
- (2015) Yue Liu et al. China Communications
- Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers
- (2015) Jue Wang et al. PLoS One
- Funding Infectious Disease Research: A Systematic Analysis of UK Research Investments by Funders 1997–2010
- (2014) Joseph R. Fitchett et al. PLoS One
- A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation
- (2014) Leah G. Nichols SCIENTOMETRICS
- A new face at Natural Science Foundation of China—An interview with NSFC President Wei Yang
- (2014) Mu-ming Poo et al. National Science Review
- How broad are our broader impacts? An analysis of the National Science Foundation's Ecosystem Studies Program and the Broader Impacts requirement
- (2013) Nalini M Nadkarni et al. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
- Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging “big data” research
- (2013) Han Woo Park et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity
- (2011) Tom Leinster et al. ECOLOGY
- Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
- (2011) Paul J. Roebber et al. PLoS One
- A forward diversity index
- (2011) Stephen Carley et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Tech mining: Text mining and visualization tools, as applied to nanoenhanced solar cells
- (2011) Alan L. Porter et al. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management
- (2010) Ismael Rafols et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Science funding: Science for the masses
- (2010) Corie Lok NATURE
- Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature
- (2010) Caroline S. Wagner et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience
- (2009) Ismael Rafols et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time
- (2009) Alan L. Porter et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
- (2008) Vincent D Blondel et al. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
- Community cleverness required
- (2008) NATURE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started