4.6 Article

Public Attitudes to Housing Systems for Pregnant Pigs

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141878

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mary and David Macaree Graduate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding concerns about the welfare of farm animals is important for the development of socially sustainable production practices. This study used an online survey to test how views on group versus stall housing for pregnant sows varied when Canadian and US participants were provided information about these systems, including access to scientific papers, YouTube videos, Google images, and a frequently-asked-questions page (S1 Appendix). Initial responses and changes in responses after accessing the information were analyzed from Likert scores of 242 participants and from their written comments. Participants were less willing to accept the use of gestation stalls after viewing information on sow housing. For example, initially 30.4% of respondents indicated that they supported the use of gestation stalls; this declined to 17.8% after participants were provided additional information. Qualitative analysis of comments showed that supporters of gestation stalls expressed concern about the spread of disease and aggression between animals in less confined systems, whereas supporters of group housing placed more emphasis on the sow's ability to interact socially and perform natural behaviors. These results point to public opposition to the use of gestation stalls, and indicate that the more that the public learns about gestation stalls the less willing they will be to accept their use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Individual and environmental factors associated with defecation while lying down in dairy cows

B. Foris, L. G. Mangilli, J. M. C. Van Os, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, J. A. Fregonesi, D. M. Weary

Summary: Cows sometimes defecate while lying down, especially when early in gestation or spending more time lying. Overstocking leads to higher stall use and displacement but does not increase defecating while recumbent frequency.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2022)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Environmental Enrichment for Rats and Mice Housed in Laboratories: A Metareview

Anna S. Ratuski, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: Environmental enrichment has been extensively studied in laboratory rodents, but there is no consensus on its definition and goals. Inconsistent use of the term creates challenges in assessing the quality of the environment, which can hinder improvements for laboratory animals. A metareview of 29 articles on environmental enrichment for rodents was conducted to understand its definitions, goals, risks, and requirements. The majority of articles conceptualize enrichment as a means to enhance natural behavior and improve animal welfare, while also addressing perceived risks and requirements. It is suggested to use more specific and value-neutral terminology to enhance clarity in future research.

ANIMALS (2022)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Rats move nesting materials to create different functional areas: Short report

Lucia Amendola, Nanqi Xu, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: This study documents how rats separate their living space into different functional regions. The results indicate that when provided with separate spaces, rats move nesting materials away from the cage containing food and water sources, but preferentially excrete in the cage with water and food.

LABORATORY ANIMALS (2023)

Review Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Invited review: Social dominance in dairy cattle: A critical review with guidelines for future research

Joseph Krahn, Borbala Foris, Daniel M. Weary, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk

Summary: This article summarizes the research on social behavior and dominance in dairy cattle. It was found that cows establish and reinforce dominance relationships through agonistic interactions. The article also criticizes the lack of standardization in past research methods and proposes more standardized approaches to measuring dominance. Finally, the article discusses future research directions and practical applications of dominance in managing dairy cattle.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2023)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Crowdsourcing remote comparative lameness assessments for dairy cattle

Kehan Sheng, Borbala Foris, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, John Gardenier, Cameron Clark, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: Lameness assessments are usually not conducted frequently on dairy farms, resulting in underestimation of lameness prevalence. A remote comparative assessment method was developed and tested, which involved nonexperienced workers watching videos of cows walking and determining which cow was more lame and by how much. This method provides a fast and cost-effective way to assess lameness and can be useful for large-scale data collection.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Calves peak-end memory of pain

Thomas Ede, Raphaela E. Woodroffe, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: The study aimed to investigate whether calves followed the 'peak-end' rule in their memory of a painful procedure (disbudding). Conditioned place aversion and reflex pain behaviors were used as proxies for retrospective and 'real-time' reports of pain. The results did not support the existence of a peak-end effect in calves' memory of pain.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2023)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

The Effect of Placement and Group Size on the Use of an Automated Brush by Groups of Lactating Dairy Cattle

Borbala Foris, Negar Sadrzadeh, Joseph Krahn, Daniel M. Weary, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk

Summary: Indoor housed dairy cows are highly motivated to scratch themselves using mechanical brushes. Many farms provide brushes to cows, yet no commercial brushes to date capture how the brushes are used by the cows in the pen. We developed an automated brush and tested how much cows use it at four different group sizes (60, 48, 36, and 24 cows) and with different brush locations in the pen. We found that cows used the brush for longer when it was close to the feed and water and when they were housed in smaller groups.

ANIMALS (2023)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Curiosity in zebrafish (Danio rerio)? Behavioral responses to 30 novel objects

Becca Franks, Leigh P. P. Gaffney, Courtney Graham, Daniel M. M. Weary

Summary: This study investigates curiosity in zebrafish and finds that they show novelty-seeking behavior and sustained interest in some objects, but habituation occurs over time. Additionally, specific objects also affect the social behavior of fish.

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE (2023)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Cage-free eggs in China

Maria Chen, Huipin Lee, Yuchen Lin, Dan Weary

ANIMAL FRONTIERS (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Social acceptance of genetic engineering technology

Katherine E. Koralesky, Lara V. Sirovica, Jillian Hendricks, Katelyn E. Mills, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: Through three mixed-method surveys, we found that the source of information, technology term, and application domain all affect the social acceptance of genetic engineering (GE). The perception of benefits has the greatest impact on acceptance, with social trust influencing acceptance through perceived benefits and risks. The source of information and technology term had minimal effect on acceptance. Applications involving animals were seen as less beneficial and more risky compared to plant applications. Assessing the acceptability of GE applications requires considering the impacts on plants, animals, and people, as well as trust in actors and technologies, and weighing the benefits and drawbacks of GE. Future research should focus on measuring acceptability of GE for animals, considering contextual factors, and utilizing inductive frameworks.

PLOS ONE (2023)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Perceptions of laboratory animal veterinarians regarding institutional transparency

Michael W. Brunt, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: This study analyzed the perceptions of laboratory animal veterinarians from different universities on institutional transparency. It found that many veterinarians do not perceive transparency as a priority and proposed a plan to increase transparency by involving multiple universities.

ANIMAL WELFARE (2023)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Public attitudes toward the use of technology to create new types of animals and animal products

Erin B. Ryan, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: Philosophers used thought experiments to study controversial cases of genetic modification. A survey of 747 US and Canadian citizens found that they were less accepting of genetically modifying chickens and animals that have no subjective experience compared to the creation of cultured meat. Some participants accepted the trade-offs imposed by the thought experiment, while others expressed discomfort and advocated for alternative approaches. The study concluded that people vary in their acceptance of interventions within existing systems, with some calling for transformational change.

ANIMAL WELFARE (2023)

Correction Biology

Hunger affects cognitive performance of dairy calves (vol 19, 20220475, 2023)

Benjamin Lecorps, Raphaela E. Woodroffe, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, Daniel M. Weary

BIOLOGY LETTERS (2023)

Article Biology

Hunger affects cognitive performance of dairy calves

Benjamin Lecorps, Raphaela E. Woodroffe, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk, Daniel M. Weary

Summary: This study used a cognitive approach to investigate the impact of restricted feeding on the cognitive abilities of dairy calves. The results showed that reducing milk allowance impaired cognitive performance and disrupted the calves' capacity to re-learn.

BIOLOGY LETTERS (2023)

Article Veterinary Sciences

How might the public contribute to the discussion on cattle welfare? Perspectives of veterinarians and animal scientists

Beth Ventura, Daniel M. Weary, Marina A. G. von Keyserlingk

Summary: This study explored the perceptions of veterinarians and animal scientists on societal expectations for farm animal welfare. The findings revealed that the public is generally concerned about farm animal welfare and has specific concerns about certain farming practices. However, there is ambiguity among the participants regarding the role of the public in finding solutions, although they suggested that consumers should bear the costs of welfare improvements.

ANIMAL WELFARE (2023)

暂无数据