4.2 Article

A perfect flower from the Jurassic of China

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 707-719

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2015.1020423

关键词

flower; angiosperm; Jurassic; China; Liaoning

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB821901]
  2. Team Program of Scientific Innovation and Interdisciplinary Cooperation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91114201, 41172006]
  4. State Forestry Administration of China [2005-122]
  5. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong [2011B060400011]
  6. Special Funds for Environmental Projects of Shenzhen [2013-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flower, enclosed ovule and tetrasporangiate anther are three major characters distinguishing angiosperms from other seed plants. Morphologically, typical flowers are characterised by an organisation with gynoecium and androecium surrounded by corolla and calyx. Theoretically, flowers are derived from their counterparts in ancient ancestral gymnosperms. However, as for when, how and from which groups, there is no consensus among botanists yet. Although angiosperm-like pollen and angiosperms have been claimed in the Triassic and Jurassic, typical flowers with the aforesaid three key characters are still missing in the pre-Cretaceous age, making many interpretations of flower evolution tentative. Thus searching for flower in the pre-Cretaceous has been a tantalising task for palaeobotanists for a long time. Here, we report a typical flower, Euanthus paniigen. et sp. nov., from the Middle-Late Jurassic of Liaoning, China. Euanthus has sepals, petals, androecium with tetrasporangiate dithecate anthers and gynoecium with enclosed ovules, organised just like in perfect flowers of extant angiosperms. The discovery of Euanthus implies that typical angiosperm flowers have already been in place in the Jurassic, and provides a new insight unavailable otherwise for the evolution of flowers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据