4.2 Article

New records of archaic ungulates from the Lower Eocene of Sanshui Basin, Guangdong, China

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 787-802

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2015.1034120

关键词

Mammalia; Altungulata; Phenacolophidae; Sanshuilophus; Guangdong; Sanshui Basin

资金

  1. Major Basic Research Projects of MST of China [2012CB821900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41404022]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-106]
  4. Special Fund for Fossil Excavation and Preparation of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenacolophidae is a group of little known archaic ungulates from the Late Paleocene to Middle Eocene of Asia. Its phylogenetic relationships with other altungulates have remained uncertain, partly because most phenacolophids are represented by poorly preserved material. Here we report a new phenacolophid, Sanshuilophus zhaoi gen. et sp. nov., from the Lower Eocene Huayong Formation of the Sanshui Basin, Guangdong, China. Although still fragmentary, the new specimens show that the new taxon is characterised by relatively large body size (except for Zaisanolophus), sub-molariform premolars, relatively higher bilophodont molars that lack the mesostyle, and tooth enamel microstructure with true prisms and typical Hunter-Schreger bands (HSB). With the new specimens and a review of the published phenacolophid material, we are able to provide an alternative identification for the tooth loci for the type specimen of Phenacolophus and further present an emended diagnosis for Phenacolophidae. The tooth morphology and enamel microstructure provide new evidence to support the notion that phenacolophids differ from species of Embrithopoda in having low-crown teeth, considerably slanting lophids, distinct paralophids and lacking the arsinoitheriid radial enamel. Phenacolophidae should not be included in Tethytheria but probably represent a stem group for altungulates, if not for all archaic ungulates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据