4.6 Article

Space Environmental Factor Impacts upon Murine Colon Microbiota and Mucosal Homeostasis

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125792

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P30 DK34987]
  3. National Space Biomedical Research Institute [NCC 9-58]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astronaut intestinal health may be impacted by microgravity, radiation, and diet. The aim of this study was to characterize how high and low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, microgravity, and elevated dietary iron affect colon microbiota (determined by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing) and colon function. Three independent experiments were conducted to achieve these goals: 1) fractionated low LET. radiation (Cs-137, 3 Gy, RAD), high Fe diet (IRON) (650 mg/kg diet), and a combination of low LET. radiation and high Fe diet (IRON+RAD) in male Sprague-Dawley rats; 2) high LET Si-38 particle exposure (0.050 Gy), 1/6 G partial weight bearing (PWB), and a combination of high (LETSi)-Si-38 particle exposure and PWB in female BalbC/ByJ mice; and 3) 13 d spaceflight in female C57BL/6 mice. Low LET radiation, IRON and spaceflight increased Bacteroidetes and decreased Firmicutes. RAD and IRON+RAD increased Lactobacillales and lowered Clostridiales compared to the control (CON) and IRON treatments. Low LET radiation, IRON, and spaceflight did not significantly affect diversity or richness, or elevate pathogenic genera. Spaceflight increased Clostridiales and decreased Lactobacillales, and similar trends were observed in the experiment using a ground-based model of microgravity, suggesting altered gravity may affect colonic microbiota. Although we noted no differences in colon epithelial injury or inflammation, spaceflight elevated TGF beta gene expression. Microbiota and mucosal characterization in these models is a first step in understanding the impact of the space environment on intestinal health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据