Fixed Effects Modelling for Provider Mortality Outcomes: Analysis of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Data-Base
出版年份 2014 全文链接
标题
Fixed Effects Modelling for Provider Mortality Outcomes: Analysis of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Data-Base
作者
关键词
Intensive care units, Forecasting, Surgical and invasive medical procedures, Digestive system procedures, Cardiovascular procedures, Diagnostic medicine, Hospitals, Trauma surgery
出版物
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages e102297
出版商
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
发表日期
2014-07-17
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0102297
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations
- (2014) Clemma J Muller et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The gradient function as an exploratory goodness-of-fit assessment of the random-effects distribution in mixed models
- (2013) Geert Verbeke et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Fixed effects analysis of repeated measures data
- (2013) Fiona Imlach Gunasekara et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio: Consequences of Adjusting Hospital Mortality with Indirect Standardization
- (2013) Maurice E. Pouw et al. PLoS One
- Evaluating the performance of Australian and New Zealand intensive care units in 2009 and 2010
- (2013) J. Kasza et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Review of Case-Mix Corrected Survival Curves
- (2012) Todd A. MacKenzie et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Global quantitative indices reflecting provider process-of-care: data-base derivation
- (2012) John L Moran et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Hospital-level associations with 30-day patient mortality after cardiac surgery: a tutorial on the application and interpretation of marginal and multilevel logistic regression
- (2012) Masoumeh Sanagou et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio Fallacy
- (2012) Yvette R. B. M. van Gestel et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets
- (2012) Prabasaj Paul et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Mortality and intensive care volume in ventilated patients from 1995 to 2009 in the Australian and New Zealand binational adult patient intensive care database*
- (2011) John L. Moran et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Logistic Versus Hierarchical Modeling: An Analysis of a Statewide Inpatient Sample
- (2011) Roxana Alexandrescu et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Identification of causal effects on binary outcomes using structural mean models
- (2010) P. S. Clarke et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- The Hospital Compare Mortality Model and the Volume-Outcome Relationship
- (2010) Jeffrey H. Silber et al. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Effect of Choice of Estimation Method on Inter-Hospital Mortality Rate Comparisons
- (2010) Patricia Kipnis et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Centers: Hierarchical Modeling Should be Used
- (2010) Lynne Moore et al. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE
- Measuring Quality for Public Reporting of Health Provider Quality: Making It Meaningful to Patients
- (2009) Dana B. Mukamel et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993–2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database*
- (2009) John L. Moran et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Risk Adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Comparison of Logistic Versus Hierarchical Modeling
- (2009) Mark E. Cohen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- In the Context of Performance Monitoring, the Caterpillar Plot Should Be Mothballed in Favor of the Funnel Plot
- (2008) Mohammed A. Mohammed et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Comparison of “Risk-Adjusted” Hospital Outcomes
- (2008) David M. Shahian et al. CIRCULATION
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started