Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups

(2013) Jamie J Kirkham et al.   Trials

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

(2013) A.-W. Chan et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Characteristics of Oncology Clinical Trials

(2013) Bradford R. Hirsch et al.   JAMA Internal Medicine

Content and Quality of 10 000 Controlled Trials in Schizophrenia Over 60 Years

(2012) Jose Miyar et al.   SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider

(2012) Paula R Williamson et al.   Trials

Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems

(2011) Nenad Kostanjsek   BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines

(2010) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

(2009) Iain Chalmers et al.   LANCET

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2009) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

(2008) Kerry Dwan et al.   PLoS One

A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children

(2008) Ian Sinha et al.   PLOS MEDICINE