4.6 Article

The Effect of Extracellular pH Changes on Intracellular pH and Nitric Oxide Concentration in Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells from Rat Aorta

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062887

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  2. Fundacao de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistencia do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto da Universidade de Sao Paulo (FAEPA/HCFMRP/USP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: It has been known for more than a century that pH changes can alter vascular tone. However, there is no consensus about the effects of pH changes on vascular response. In this study, we investigated the effects of extracellular pH (pH(o)) changes on intracellular pH (pH(i)) and intracellular nitric oxide concentration ([NO](i)) in freshly isolated endothelial cells and cross sections from rat aorta. Main Methods: The HCl was used to reduce the pH(o) from 7.4 to 7.0 and from 7.4 to 6.5; the NaOH was used to increase the pHo from 7.4 to 8.0 and from 7.4 to 8.5. The fluorescent dyes 5-(and-6)-carboxy SNARF-1, acetoxymethyl ester, acetate (SNARF-1) and diaminofluorescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM DA) were employed to measure the pH(i) and [NO](i), respectively. The fluorescence intensity was measured in freshly isolated endothelial cells by flow cytometry and in freshly obtained aorta cross sections by confocal microscopy. Key Findings: The endothelial and vascular smooth muscle pH(i) was increased at pH(o) 8.5. The extracellular acidification did not change the endothelial pH(i), but the smooth muscle pH(i) was reduced at pH(o) 7.0. At pH(o) 8.5 and pH(o) 6.5, the endothelial [NO](i) was increased. Both extracellular alkalinization and acidification increased the vascular smooth muscle [NO](i). Significance: Not all changes in pH(o) did result in pH(i) changes, but disruption of acid-base balance in both directions induced NO synthesis in the endothelium and/or vascular smooth muscle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据