4.6 Article

PlcRa, a New Quorum-Sensing Regulator from Bacillus cereus, Plays a Role in Oxidative Stress Responses and Cysteine Metabolism in Stationary Phase

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051047

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-09-Blan-0253]
  2. INRA (MICA department)
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0253] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We characterized a new quorum-sensing regulator, PlcRa, which is present in various members of the B. cereus group and identified a signaling heptapeptide for PlcRa activity: PapRa(7). We demonstrated that PlcRa is a 3D structural paralog of PlcR using sequence analysis and homology modeling. A comparison of the transcriptomes at the onset of stationary phase of a Delta plcRa mutant and the wild-type B. cereus ATCC 14579 strain showed that 68 genes were upregulated and 49 genes were downregulated in the DplcRa mutant strain (>3-fold change). Genes involved in the cysteine metabolism (putative CymR regulon) were downregulated in the Delta plcRa mutant strain. We focused on the gene with the largest difference in expression level between the two conditions, which encoded -AbrB2-a new regulator of the AbrB family. We demonstrated that purified PlcRa bound specifically to the abrB2 promoter in the presence of synthetic PapRa(7), in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. We further showed that the AbrB2 regulator controlled the expression of the yrrT operon involved in methionine to cysteine conversion. We found that the DplcRa mutant strain was more sensitive to hydrogen peroxide-and disulfide-induced stresses than the wild type. When cystine was added to the culture of the DplcRa mutant, challenged with hydrogen peroxide, growth inhibition was abolished. In conclusion, we identified a new RNPP transcriptional regulator in B. cereus that activated the oxidative stress response and cysteine metabolism in transition state cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据