4.6 Article

Statistical Object Data Analysis of Taxonomic Trees from Human Microbiome Data

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048996

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant Human Microbiome Project Consortium Sequencing of Healthy People'' [U54 HG004968]
  2. NIH Grant The Neonatal Microbiome and Necrotizing Enterocolotis'' [1UH2AI083265]
  3. St. Louis Children's Hospital Grant The St. Louis Neonatal Gut Microbiome Initiative''
  4. Children Discovery Institute Grant The St. Louis Neonatal Gut Microbiome Initiative''

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human microbiome research characterizes the microbial content of samples from human habitats to learn how interactions between bacteria and their host might impact human health. In this work a novel parametric statistical inference method based on object-oriented data analysis (OODA) for analyzing HMP data is proposed. OODA is an emerging area of statistical inference where the goal is to apply statistical methods to objects such as functions, images, and graphs or trees. The data objects that pertain to this work are taxonomic trees of bacteria built from analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences (e. g. using RDP); there is one such object for each biological sample analyzed. Our goal is to model and formally compare a set of trees. The contribution of our work is threefold: first, a weighted tree structure to analyze RDP data is introduced; second, using a probability measure to model a set of taxonomic trees, we introduce an approximate MLE procedure for estimating model parameters and we derive LRT statistics for comparing the distributions of two metagenomic populations; and third the Jumpstart HMP data is analyzed using the proposed model providing novel insights and future directions of analysis. Citation: La Rosa PS, Shands B, Deych E, Zhou Y, Sodergren E, et al. (2012) Statistical Object Data Analysis of Taxonomic Trees from Human Microbiome Data. PLoS ONE 7(11): e48996. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048996

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据