4.5 Article

Two new species of Saurichthys (Actinopterygii: Saurichthyidae) from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland, with implications for character evolution in the genus

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 173, 期 4, 页码 887-912

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12224

关键词

Actinopterygii; Besano Formation; Ladinian; Monte San Giorgio; palaeobiogeography; phylogeny; Saurichthyidae; Triassic

类别

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRSII3-136293, SNF 144462]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41102011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Saurichthys, characterized by a long slender body and an elongated rostrum, is one of the most iconic genera of Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic fishes. The genus was particularly speciose in the Triassic, with a global distribution in both marine and freshwater habitats. Here, we describe two new species from the Middle Triassic Besano Formation of Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland, Saurichthys breviabdominalis sp. nov. and Saurichthys rieppeli sp. nov. S.breviabdominalis is characterized by a proportionately long operculum, short abdominal region and rib-like mid-lateral scales, whereas S.rieppeli is divergent from other Middle Triassic saurichthyids in the block-like haemal arches, fringing fulcra on the pelvic and unpaired fins, and reduction of the squamation to a single row in the abdominal region. Phylogenetic analysis places S.rieppeli in a basal position relative to congeners from the Alpine Triassic, and supports previous hypotheses regarding the convergent evolution of reduced squamation within saurichthyids. S.breviabdominalis forms a monophyletic group with species from the same locality, suggesting divergence in sympatry. This finding has implications for our understanding of disparity and character evolution in saurichthyid fishes, as well as ecomorphological divergence and resource partitioning between closely related fishes in Triassic marine ecosystems.(c) 2015 The Linnean Society of London

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据