4.6 Article

Caspase-1 and IL-1β Processing in a Teleost Fish

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050450

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [PTDC/CVT/69086/2006, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-007173]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/37717/2007]
  3. Programa Ciencia
  4. Programa Operacional Potencial Humano POPH - QREN - Tipologia 4.2 - Promocao do Emprego Cientifico
  5. Fundo Social Europeu
  6. Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (MCTES)
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/37717/2007, PTDC/CVT/69086/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukine-1 beta (IL-1 beta) is the most studied pro-inflammatory cytokine, playing a central role in the generation of systemic and local responses to infection, injury, and immunological challenges. In mammals, IL-1 beta is synthesized as an inactive 31 kDa precursor that is cleaved by caspase-1 generating a 17.5 kDa secreted active mature form. The caspase-1 cleavage site strictly conserved in all mammalian IL-1 beta sequences is absent in IL-1 beta sequences reported for non-mammalian vertebrates. Recently, fish caspase-1 orthologues have been identified in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and sea bream (Sparus aurata) but very little is known regarding their processing and activity. In this work it is shown that sea bass caspase-1 auto-processing is similar to that of the human enzyme, resulting in active p24/p10 and p20/p10 heterodimers. Moreover, the presence of alternatively spliced variants of caspase-1 in sea bass is reported. The existence of caspase-1 isoforms in fish and in mammals suggests that they have been evolutionarily maintained and therefore are likely to play a regulatory role in the inflammatory response, as shown for other caspases. Finally, it is shown that sea bass and avian IL-1 beta are specifically cleaved by caspase-1 at different but phylogenetically conserved aspartates, distinct from the cleavage site of mammalian IL-1 beta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据