4.6 Article

Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Research: A Survey on Magnitude, Drivers, Consequences and Potential Solutions

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043404

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Publication bias jeopardizes evidence-based medicine, mainly through biased literature syntheses. Publication bias may also affect laboratory animal research, but evidence is scarce. Objectives: To assess the opinion of laboratory animal researchers on the magnitude, drivers, consequences and potential solutions for publication bias. And to explore the impact of size of the animals used, seniority of the respondent, working in a for-profit organization and type of research (fundamental, pre-clinical, or both) on those opinions. Design: Internet-based survey. Setting: All animal laboratories in The Netherlands. Participants: Laboratory animal researchers. Main Outcome Measure(s): Median (interquartile ranges) strengths of beliefs on 5 and 10-point scales (1: totally unimportant to 5 or 10: extremely important). Results: Overall, 454 researchers participated. They considered publication bias a problem in animal research (7 (5 to 8)) and thought that about 50% (32-70) of animal experiments are published. Employees (n = 21) of for-profit organizations estimated that 10% (5 to 50) are published. Lack of statistical significance (4 (4 to 5)), technical problems (4 (3 to 4)), supervisors (4 (3 to 5)) and peer reviewers (4 (3 to 5)) were considered important reasons for non-publication (all on 5-point scales). Respondents thought that mandatory publication of study protocols and results, or the reasons why no results were obtained, may increase scientific progress but expected increased bureaucracy. These opinions did not depend on size of the animal used, seniority of the respondent or type of research. Conclusions: Non-publication of negative results appears to be prevalent in laboratory animal research. If statistical significance is indeed a main driver of publication, the collective literature on animal experimentation will be biased. This will impede the performance of valid literature syntheses. Effective, yet efficient systems should be explored to counteract selective reporting of laboratory animal research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Medical Ethics

Replication and trustworthiness

Rik Peels, Lex Bouter

Summary: This paper explores the relationships between replication and trustworthiness, including the relationships between different types of replication and trustworthiness, the relationship between replication intentionality and trustworthiness, and whether the trustworthiness of research findings depends on what is at stake. It concludes that replication should be considered along with other factors in assessing the trustworthiness of research findings.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Article Medical Ethics

Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates

Tamarinde Haven, Lex Bouter, Louise Mennen, Joeri Tijdink

Summary: One way to strengthen research integrity is through supervision. The study developed a 3-day pilot training for PhD supervisors that combined responsible research practices (RRPs) and interpersonal skills. The results showed that both supervisors and PhD candidates had more positive perceptions of the supervisor's interpersonal skills and ability to foster RRPs after the training.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Bias? Clarifying the language barrier between epidemiologists and economists

A. N. Varga, A. E. Guevara Morel, J. M. van Dongen, J. Lokkerbol, M. Lindeboom, M. W. van Tulder, L. M. Bouter, J. E. Bosmans

Summary: This paper discusses the collaboration challenges faced by epidemiologists and economists in health intervention research due to differences in terminology, and illustrates these differences with examples. The study aims to improve the quality of multidisciplinary collaboration between the two fields and assist researchers in selecting the most suitable analytical techniques for their research problems.

HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2023)

Editorial Material Medical Ethics

In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder

Jeroen de Ridder, Lex Bouter, Tamarinde Haven, Rik Peels, Joeri Tijdink, Maurice P. Zeegers

Summary: We evaluate Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and find that they fail to address the main issues or rely on controversial assumptions about the Code's purpose. While Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his proposed revisions to the Code are unjustified.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials

Johanna A. Damen, Pauline Heus, Herm J. Lamberink, Joeri K. Tijdink, Lex Bouter, Paul Glasziou, David Moher, Willem M. Otte, Christiaan H. Vinkers, Lotty Hooft

Summary: This study explores indicators of questionable research practices in randomized controlled trials, including bias risk, selective reporting bias, sample size, and statistical discrepancy. The findings suggest that more recent publication year, trial registration, mentioning of reporting standards, and higher journal impact factor are associated with a lower risk of questionable research practices.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Review Environmental Studies

Guidance on research integrity provided by pan-European discipline-specific learned societies: A scoping review

Rosie Hastings, Krishma Labib, Iris Lechner, Lex Bouter, Guy Widdershoven, Natalie Evans

Summary: This study aims to assess the differences between research integrity guidance provided by pan-European discipline-specific learned societies and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA code), as well as the differences among the guidance from different discipline societies. The study found that the guidance provided by learned societies mainly focuses on research culture and environment, with notable differences among disciplines.

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY (2023)

Article Medical Ethics

How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity?

Krishma Labib, Joeri Tijdink, Klaas Sijtsma, Lex Bouter, Natalie Evans, Guy Widdershoven

Summary: Research integrity is important, but rules alone may not be enough to improve research practice without commitment from researchers. This paper explores combining rules and commitment through market, bureaucratic, and network governance modes. The use of network processes can legitimize and regulate systems, but there needs to be a balance between the different governance modes for fostering research integrity.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Editorial Material Medical Ethics

Research misconduct and questionable research practices form a continuum

Lex Bouter

Summary: Research data mismanagement poses a serious threat to accountability, reproducibility, and data re-use. However, the categorization of RDMM into intentional misconduct and unintentional questionable practice is not accurate. It is challenging to prove intentionality, and other criteria should be considered when determining the severity of a breach of research integrity. Instead of focusing on intentionality and sanctions, efforts should be directed towards improving data management practices through preventive actions led by research institutions.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Article Medical Ethics

Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved

Lex Bouter

Summary: Trust is crucial for scholars to collaborate and apply research findings. Open science practices strengthen research transparency and accountability, allowing for the verification of trustworthiness. However, questionable research practices and perverse incentives in the research system can pose challenges to maintaining research integrity.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines

Mario Malicki, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Lex Bouter, Adrian Mulligan, Gerben ter Riet

Summary: Calls have been made to improve transparency in research and work climates, and prevent detrimental research practices. A survey was conducted among authors, reviewers, and editors to assess their attitudes and practices in these areas. The results showed no significant differences in attitudes towards transparency and work climates among the different groups. Fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and lack of citing prior research were perceived as more prevalent by editors than authors or reviewers. Overall, a considerable proportion of respondents admitted sacrificing quality for quantity and reported interference from funders in study design or reporting. While the respondents were from various countries, the low response rate limits the generalizability of the findings. Nevertheless, the results highlight the need for increased involvement of stakeholders to align practices with current recommendations.

PLOS ONE (2023)

Article Ethics

The Contribution of Moral Case Deliberation to Teaching RCR to PhD Students

Giulia Inguaggiato, Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans, Fenneke Blom, Lex Bouter, Guy Widdershoven

Summary: In this paper, the authors demonstrate the value of using Moral Case Deliberation, a case reflection method, in teaching responsible conduct of research (RCR) to PhD students. This method helps students become aware of and internalize RCR principles and values, reflect on their own conduct in daily practice, and develop dialogical skills for discussing RCR issues. By focusing on values and personal motivations, reflecting on real experiences and dilemmas, and cultivating participants' dialogical skills, this method supports students in acting responsibly and pursuing RCR in their research practice.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2023)

Article Medical Ethics

The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study

I. M. Lechner, L. B. Mokkink, G. J. de Ridder, R. van Woudenberg, L. M. Bouter, J. K. Tijdink

Summary: This study used empirical methods to identify the epistemic responsibilities of universities, and found that universities should foster research integrity, stimulate the development of intellectual virtues, address the big questions of life, cultivate the diversity of disciplinary fields, serve and engage with society, and cultivate and safeguard academic freedom. These findings can inform the debate about the roles and responsibilities of universities and highlight the importance of epistemic tasks.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)

Article Ethics

Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans, Daniel Pizzolato, Noemie Aubert Bonn, Guy Widdershoven, Lex Bouter, Teodora Konach, Miranda Langendam, Kris Dierickx, Joeri Tijdink

Summary: In order to promote research integrity, research institutions have developed guidelines for research integrity education. These guidelines focus on different target groups and recommend mandatory training, follow-up refresher training, informal discussions, rewards and incentives, and evaluation of educational events. The guidelines provide practical guidance for institutions to develop a successful research integrity education strategy and are available as publicly accessible tools.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2023)

Article Ethics

What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?

Shaoxiong Brian Xu, Natalie Evans, Guangwei Hu, Lex Bouter

Summary: Academic journal publications may be retracted due to research misconduct, and retraction notices often lack information about institutional investigations. An analysis of 7,318 retraction notices published between 1927 and 2019 found that only a minority mentioned institutional investigations, with journal authorities being the most commonly mentioned. The introduction of retraction guidelines by COPE in 2009 increased the likelihood of reporting investigations by journal authorities. Retraction notices in social sciences and humanities were more likely to disclose investigations by research performing organizations compared to biomedical and natural sciences.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2023)

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action

Tony Ross-Hellauer, Lex M. Bouter, Serge P. J. M. Horbach

Summary: Open Peer Review is gaining attention and use, but there is a need for additional evidence to responsibly promote it. In this article, we propose a preliminary research agenda and issue a call to action.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2023)

暂无数据