4.6 Article

Bayesian Latent Class Models in Malaria Diagnosis

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040633

关键词

-

资金

  1. STP malaria control programme
  2. International Cooperation and Development Fund of Taiwan
  3. RIDES/Malaria CPLP
  4. Fundacao Nacional para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [PTDC/SAU-ESA/81240/2006, PEst-OE/MAT/UI0006/2011]
  5. FCT [SFRH/BD/69793/2010]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/69793/2010, PTDC/SAU-ESA/81240/2006, PEst-OE/MAT/UI0006/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The main focus of this study is to illustrate the importance of the statistical analysis in the evaluation of the accuracy of malaria diagnostic tests, without admitting a reference test, exploring a dataset (n = 3317) collected in Sao Tome and Principe. Methods: Bayesian Latent Class Models (without and with constraints) are used to estimate the malaria infection prevalence, together with sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values of three diagnostic tests (RDT, Microscopy and PCR), in four subpopulations simultaneously based on a stratified analysis by age groups (<5, >= 5 years old) and fever status (febrile, afebrile). Results: In the afebrile individuals with at least five years old, the posterior mean of the malaria infection prevalence is 3.2% with a highest posterior density interval of [2.3-4.1]. The other three subpopulations (febrile >= 5 years, afebrile or febrile children less than 5 years) present a higher prevalence around 10.3% [8.8-11.7]. In afebrile children under-five years old, the sensitivity of microscopy is 50.5% [37.7-63.2]. In children under-five, the estimated sensitivities/specificities of RDT are 95.4% [90.3-99.5]/93.8% [91.6-96.0] - afebrile - and 94.1% [87.5-99.4]/97.5% [95.5-99.3] - febrile. In individuals with at least five years old are 96.0% [91.5-99.7]/98.7% [98.1-99.2] - afebrile - and 97.9% [95.3-99.8]/97.7% [96.6-98.6] - febrile. The PCR yields the most reliable results in four subpopulations. Conclusions: The utility of this RDT in the field seems to be relevant. However, in all subpopulations, data provide enough evidence to suggest caution with the positive predictive values of the RDT. Microscopy has poor sensitivity compared to the other tests, particularly, in the afebrile children less than 5 years. This type of findings reveals the danger of statistical analysis based on microscopy as a reference test. Bayesian Latent Class Models provide a powerful tool to evaluate malaria diagnostic tests, taking into account different groups of interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据