4.1 Article

Scan time reduction in 23Na-Magnetic Resonance Imaging using the chemical shift imaging sequence: Evaluation of an iterative reconstruction method

期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 275-286

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2014.08.007

关键词

Na-23-MRI; compressed sensing; undersampling; constrained reconstruction

资金

  1. Deutsche Telekom Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To evaluate potential scan time reduction in Na-23-Magnetic Resonance Imaging with the chemical shift imaging sequence (CSI) using undersampled data of high-quality datasets, reconstructed with an iterative constrained reconstruction, compared to reduced resolution or reduced signal-to-noise ratio. Materials and Methods: CSI Na-23-images were retrospectively undersampled and reconstructed with a constrained reconstruction scheme. The results were compared to conventional methods of scan time reduction. The constrained reconstruction scheme used a phase constraint and a finite object support, which was extracted from a spatially registered H-1-image acquired with a double-tuned coil. The methods were evaluated using numerical simulations, phantom images and in-vivo images of a healthy volunteer and a patient who suffered from cerebral ischemic stroke. Results: The constrained reconstruction scheme showed improved image quality compared to a decreased number of averages, images with decreased resolution or circular undersampling with weighted averaging for any undersampling factor. Brain images of a stroke patient, which were reconstructed from three-fold undersampled k-space data, resulted in only minor differences from the original image (normalized root means square error < 12%) and an almost identical delineation of the stroke region (mismatch < 6%). Conclusion: The acquisition of undersampled Na-23-CSI images enables up to three-fold scan time reduction with improved image quality compared to conventional methods of scan time saving.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据