4.7 Article

Moving average reversion strategy for on-line portfolio selection

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 104-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2015.01.006

关键词

Portfolio selection; On-line learning; Mean reversion; Moving average reversion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71401128]
  2. the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. tier-1 research grant of Singapore Management University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On-line portfolio selection, a fundamental problem in computational finance, has attracted increasing interest from artificial intelligence and machine learning communities in recent years. Empirical evidence shows that stock's high and low prices are temporary and stock prices are likely to follow the mean reversion phenomenon. While existing mean reversion strategies are shown to achieve good empirical performance on many real datasets, they often make the single-period mean reversion assumption, which is not always satisfied, leading to poor performance in certain real datasets. To overcome this limitation, this article proposes a multiple-period mean reversion, or so-called Moving Average Reversion (MAR), and a new on-line portfolio selection strategy named On-Line Moving Average Reversion (OLMAR), which exploits MAR via efficient and scalable online machine learning techniques. From our empirical results on real markets, we found that OLMAR can overcome the drawbacks of existing mean reversion algorithms and achieve significantly better results, especially on the datasets where existing mean reversion algorithms failed. In addition to its superior empirical performance, OLMAR also runs extremely fast, further supporting its practical applicability to a wide range of applications. Finally, we have made all the datasets and source codes of this work publicly available at our, project website: http://OLPS.stevenhoi.org/. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据